You are here

Promising Practices Dissemination

The Promising Practices Dissemination work group has created a comprehensive system to recruit leaders, review applications and bring quality presentations to the STEM committee that will share promising practices, strategies, tools and much more!
Here is the criteria in which applications are reviewed:

  1. Quality of Information: Information clearly relates to the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples.
  2. Relevancy to Audience: Information is relevant to STEM committee work. Provides several practices relevant to STEM committee work.
  3. Adaptable to the STEM in OST/ASP field: Clearly identifies replicable or adaptable strategies for the STEM in OST/ASP field. Offers several adaptable practices that can be replicated in the STEM in OST/ASP field.
  4. Understanding of Supporting Research: Clearly aligns to research-based data. Provides several examples of supporting data.
  5. Evidence of Promising Practice: Clearly shows evidence of both quantitative and qualitative data. Provides several examples of qualitative and quantitative data.

If you know someone who would be a great presenter, please complete the Referral form here.

Guest Speaker Work Group

Name Organization
Jamie Culbertson Stanislaus County Office of Education
Stela Oliveira LA's BEST After School Program
Traci Wierman Lawrence Hall of Science
Shirley Rosenbloom Sacramento START
Jeff Hamlin Ventura County Office of Education - Region 8 RASTAS rep
Susan McConnell Mendocino County Office of Education
Amanda Worley High Desert Leapin’ Lizards
Sandra Birmingham UC Channel Islands
Mary Jo Ginty Regional Lead: Region 11
Jeff Davis CAN
Uyen Do CAN
Linda Galliher Bay Area Council
Emily Tozzi Lindsay Wildlife Museum

 

Resources: